Vettel’s ‘deceit’ floors Ferrari in Russia

Ferrari came crashing back down to earth at the Russian GP as their winning run was ended — with Sebastian Vettel forced to retire and Charles Leclerc finishing third after a team strategy controversy.

The Scuderia looked in a good position to add to their three-race streak after Vettel passed Lewis Hamilton and the pole-sitting Leclerc at the start, making it a Ferrari one-two.

But there was early discontent as Leclerc expected to be let back ahead of his teammate after giving him the slipstream by moving to the left.

Ferrari issued team orders to instruct Vettel to swap positions with Leclerc but the defiant German, pulling away out in front, refused.

Team boss Mattia Binotto told Sky F1 that “ideally” Leclerc would have been given the lead back but that Vettel was “very fast” and so all orders were postponed.

Decent @F1 today. Vettel was out of order as it was crystal clear what the agreement was (Leclerc letting him slipstream) but frankly I'm not surprised, the mistake was Ferrari making the 'deal' at all. Hey ho, Charles is the real deal, these experiences will make him stronger!

Team orders aside… it's early days but #Vettel surely sat in a meeting with #Leclerc, agreed a strategy and then used that trust to get himself ahead – not by superior speed but by deceit. How can #Ferrari fight a championship with that going on in the team?

The two drivers did effectively swap positions after that as Leclerc, who stopped first, undercut Vettel as Ferrari kept the race leader out longer. But soon after his pit-stop, the four-time world champion pulled over with an engine problem.

That led to a Virtual Safety Car, which allowed Mercedes to take a “free” first pit-stop — both their drivers started on the more durable medium tyres — and Hamilton then took the lead, which he never relinquished.

Mercedes technical director James Allison described the circumstances — Vettel’s failure giving Mercedes the lead — as “deliciously ironic”.

Leclerc dropped back to third after pitting for fresh soft tyres following a Safety Car, but couldn’t get past Valtteri Bottas.


Sebastian Vettel takes the lead from pole-sitter Charles Leclerc. (Photo by Mark Thompson/Getty Images)Source:Getty Images

Lap 6 Ferrari to Leclerc: “Sebastian will let you by, next lap.”

Vettel: “I would have passed him anyway. Let’s break away for another two laps, let me know.”

Lap 7 Ferrari to Vettel: “Let Charles by.”

Vettel: “He will have to close up.”

Leclerc: “You put me behind, I respected everything. We’ll speak later. But now it is difficult to close the gap obviously.”

Lap 8 Ferrari to Vettel: “He’s trying to close the gap. Let him by, he is 1.4s behind.”

Lap 9 Ferrari to Vettel: “We are looking to Plan C, Charles 1.9 sec behind. You are the fastest car on track, head down, you are doing well.”

Ferrari’s tactics

Plan A – Make sure Vettel wins
Plan B – Make sure Leclerc wins
Plan C – Make sure it’s a Mercedes 1-2

Lap 10 Ferrari to Leclerc: “Charles, we will do the swap a bit later on, Lewis is a bit close and we want to push now, just focus on your race.”

Lap 10 Leclerc: “I completely understand. I gave you the slipstream, no problems, but then I tried to push at the beginning of the race. But … no problems. Manage the situation.”


Sebastian Vettel

“I don’t know exactly what happened there, to be honest. I think we had an agreement and I spoke with Charles before the race. I think it was quite clear. But yeah … I don’t know. Maybe I missed something. I’m sure we’ll talk about it. It’s bitter today because we wanted to finish one and two, and now Charles is third. Not the result that we want.”

Asked what that ‘agreement’ was, Vettel added: “I don’t want to share. I don’t want to put the team in a bad position afterwards because somebody said something here and there. I know it’s not fair because I think people deserve to know, it’s not a big deal. I was in third, Charles was in first, and we were talking about a strategy to get past Lewis. Obviously I had a very good start and then there were a couple of options on the table.”

Who is number one? (Photo by Charles Coates/Getty Images)Source:Getty Images

Charles Leclerc

“I will always trust the team but the tactic was me giving the slipstream to be one-two at the end of the straight, which happened but then … I don’t know. I need to speak to the team to know the situation better.”

“We’ll try to speak now,” he explained. “I think everything has been respected in a way because I gave the slipstream then we had to do the swap back which we did at the pit-stop. That’s it.

“For sure [Seb] did a great start, but the start performance themselves were exactly the same. Then I just stayed on the left to give him the slipstream. There are no big deals and I think in the end everyone respected their own things.”

Leclerc says he saw no reason to fight Vettel at the start: "I trusted completely that we would swap after". Said earlier the trust is still there with Vettel despite today #F1 #RussianGP

Mattia Binotto

“Ideally, Charles would have given the slipstream at the start to Seb to make sure that we would have been first and second at the first lap, and this would have given us the best position to control and manage the race, which was happening to the point of unreliability.

“By the time he would have given the slipstream and Sebastian would have had that kind of advantage, ideally we would have swapped back. But Seb was very fast in the race. So I think every decision could have been postponed.

“Initially, we asked them to swap but that was not the case because Charles was not sufficiently close to him.

“Sebastian got such a good start that he overtook Hamilton very soon, even before Turn 1. In his mind, which is probably right, it wasn’t Charles giving him the slipstream — he took the slipstream because he was in that position.

“If Charles went to the right he would have given the slipstream to Hamilton. If we weren’t one and two at the end of the first lap it would have been worse.”

This article was originally published by Sky Sports and reproduced with permission

Source: Read Full Article